Greater Manchester Police with Lancashire in Organised Crime 13th in series

This is the 13th entry in this series and shows the jigsaw pieces being added to form the overall picture of organised crime, mafiosa style led by Lancashire County Council (LCC). PAYOLA is evidenced.

"Manchester Police Corruption at 3rd world levels" Home Office Survey.
"Something is rotten in the state of Manchester" (apologies to Shakespeare).

At the end of 2003 I had reported the perjury, conspiracy to pervert justice, fraud etc of Manchester tribunals (M.E.T.) to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) at Bootle Street station. (links http://www.criticalreader2007.blogspot.com/ http://www.woodsresearch05.blogspot.com/ and http://www.criticalreadercw2.blogspot.com/

A Justine Curran as Divisional Commander had written to me saying that someone would be appointed as investigating officer and that person would be in touch.
D S ANDREW RIGBY contacted me, and had eventually visited me at home on 5th Feb 2004 taking evidence of the crimes committed.
He had laughed saying he had never seen so much evidence. He had also asked for originals of documents which I wouldn't give him,"No". "I thought you'd say that" he said.
A Stuart Smith was with Rigby and a friend and neighbour was with me.
Rigby signed for what he had taken from me and I was to wait and hear from him about proceeding, meanwhile we would maintain contact via emails.

The events of later in Feb and March 04 are recorded at http://www.criticalreadercw4.blogspot.com/ and I had told Rigby about those appalling events although being out of his policing area he couldn't investigate them. I wanted him to know of them and to see the urgency and developing nastiness of my situation here in Lancaster. (Lancashire police knew and did nothing, link yet to be added.)

On May 26th 2004 Rigby finally emailed me about coming again to proceed.
I replied immediately saying I could see him as soon as possible.
I heard nothing.
I waited a couple of days and emailed him again offering my mobile phone number for his convenience.
I heard nothing.
I emailed again asking if I had said anything inappropriate. I still heard nothing.
I thought he had taken the proverbial brown envelope.

On June 14th I rang the station just to see if he had been off ill or on leave. No, he had been working normally.
I knew he had taken the brown envelope.
I was busy with Sheffield Magistrates Court (see link http://www.criticalreadercw5.blogpsot.com/ but wrote twice to Rigby via email attachments to keep the record straight.
I sent him copies of the false warrants for my arrest (see links http://www.woodsresearch05.blogspot.com/ and http://www.criticalreadercw4.blogspot.com/) hoping he would see the extent of the corruption and harassment etc. I was enduring but heard nothing.

My enquiries led me to a Superintendent Shewan and I had written to him about the matters in his Bootle St station. On 5th July 2004 I received a letter from Rigby dated 30 June 2004 offering nothing more than a semi-literate rant. In his letter he said that the CPS in Manchester had seen my documents and that there was no case for anyone to answer.
He ended by saying if he ever saw me again he would arrest me.
I took the next train to Manchester, met with 2 others and went to the CPS on Quay Street.
The receptionist had no knowledge of any dealings on my case. I was referred to NORMAN REED.
Mr Reed spoke at length to us and confirmed that Rigby had submitted nothing.
Mr Reed took a copy of Rigby's letter to me because, as he said, it implicated the CPS and would have to go to HQ in London.
He said he would try and contact Rigby meanwhile to find out what was going on and would let me know as soon as he had learned anything.
N Reed was given copies of other documents he asked for as well as Rigby's letter.

We then went to Bootle St and before asking for Rigby I handed in a letter for Sup. Shewan, with enclosures.
I then asked if the desk clerk could check his computer and give me details of any warrants for my arrest.
Careful checks were made, there were no warrants.
I showed Rigby's letter and the desk clerk was suitably disgusted with its contents.
I was to see someone higher up the ladder. Rigby was out but a SERGEANT WHITE would see us.
He took us to an interview room and went to see if he could contact Rigby and confirm that Rigby had sent me the letter.
When White returned he was a changed personality. He had obviously spoken to Rigby who must have told White to get rid of me before anyone else spoke to me.
One witness was taking notes, White was agitated and the promise of someone higher up was forgotten.
White assualted me in getting me out of the station before someone higher up asked what was going on.
White said that no one knew of the warrants becasue they were secret warrants. I do not joke.

I wrote to Mark Bell, Rigby's manager, Bell lied in his first letter to me and then changed his mind when we spoke on the phone.
He also confirmed that Rigby had all my letters to Sup. Shewan. Sup. Shewan hadn't received any, Rigby had intercepted them all. Bell explained that Sup. Shewan was not in Bootle St but he had been when I made enquiries. They should have been sent on, Interception of Communications Act 1085, Rigby committing more crime.

On July 12th Rigby left a message for me on my mobile phone. N Reed had written to me saying that Rigby was being evasive and refused to return their calls. I spoke to N Reed on the phone later and he said that Rigby was then still proving elusive.
Rigby's message to me on the 12th was that he had then got the warrants for my arrest and I had to meet him in a police station so we could 'discuss' them.
As a former probation officer I knew that warrants were not 'discussed', I also knew much else about them.
Rigby clearly thought I was stupid as he was.
I taped his message before changing my SIM card and the tape was transferred more professionally onto a CD.
They are all still in my possession.

My complaint went to INTERNAL AFFAIRS, CHESTER HOUSE and a SERGEANT HINES and a BRIAN DAVIES were my contacts.
I wrote to N Reed again and told him about Rigby's call to me. Reed then wrote to me saying he suddenly remembered the file that Rigby had left with them. No he hadn't, I knew processes and procedures.
The problem for all concerned was that no-one knew what I had given to Rigby except Rigby and myself. The documents were variously described and at one stage referred to as a file. I hadn't given a file. Rigby signed for what he taken from me and that is also in my possession.
Reed was covering for Rigby, I reported him to his manger, KEVIN FOX and my witnesses were so dismayed with Reed that they wrote as well. Kevin Fox tried to distance himself. (See CPS link to be added.)

Meanwhile Davies had tried to have me deal with him on the phone, I insisted we have everything in writing. Emails were the easiest. Davies expressed concern that my having everything in writing would slow things up. He did email me at first by sending anonymous emails.
When challenged he said it was computer fault.
His computer suddenly recovered but Hines was recruited now and rang me catching me unawares.
Time was moving on, I had a hearing in M.E.T. again in Sept. 04, LCc were concerned that they may not be able to buy off the next bench (see links for FRAUD etc as ref above).

Davies and Hines were to call and see me at my house as soon as possible. I said I needed to arrange for someone to be with me as witness. Hines was furious and shouting at me over the phone. He said I was wasting time and didn't need a witness. He said that they had to come to my house and it would be better if I was alone. He mentioned the false warrants and I told him that Risley prison was closed to women in 1998. This made him livid, "Well you're still going" he screamed at me.
This was awful, I said I'd email B Davies when they could come if he would offer me likely dates.
I was offered two dates, one being immediately and the other being 27th Sept.
They knew I wouldn't do the first and they knew about M.E.T. on the 29th of that I was sure now. They were being sent to 'sort me out' before getting to M.E.T.

There were no other dates available Hines said, I wondered what had happened to their wish for speed. 27th Sept was a few weeks away at that point. Now speed was not an issue. More thugs of the state who think that the general public is as stupid as they are.
(The case in M.E.T. was against the Adult College Lancaster yet to be added but see criticalreadercw2 above)
Anything could have happened on the 27th to prevent me going on the 29th.

I had to go into town after that awful man rang off and I passed a firm of solicitors who advertised prsonal injury claims against the police. It was DOUGLAS CLIFT and SONS CHURCH St LANCASTER and I saw a MARK BENNETT. (See Law Society link to be added.)
Bennett would represent me, not for the tribunal but for everyhting else.
He told me not to see Hines and Davies at home but to let them know we would meet in his office on the 27th.
I emailed Davies and gave him the news. I was vague about the firm but Davies wondered where they would park and how to get to the office. He was fishing. I told him I would send full travel details nearer the time.

I called in again to Bennett and left some documents for him to read.
Davies wrote again saying that they couldn't see me now. They would have to arrest me if they saw me.
I wrote to Lancaster police and told them when I would be at home for them to come and arrest me. I gave a day, date and time but nobody came.
I went into different police stations inviting arrest, I have no idea what they thought about me but no one would arrest me. Oldham police spent almost two hours trying to find someone who knew anything about these supposed warrants but no one did. Rochdale police were also helpful but they couldn't arrest me either. The warrants were obviously very secret.
I had asked Riby if he could tell me the charge(s), the issuing magistrates or police or dates, anything in fact that would help us find these secret warrants.
At the time I had just got police clearance for my job. I was self employed as Quality Assurance Facilitator for prison education departments. I travelled round West Yorkshire for much of that work but nobody could arrest me there either, I know because I invited them to.
LCC found out about Bennett and his Freemason connections made sure that he didn't contact me again after 29th Sept, and he never returned my documents.

I never heard from HINES or DAVIES again either but complained to Manchester Police Authority who were very good in the main.
A JOHNATHON LOWE wrote to me showing himself to be a liar, another bent copper, and the IPCC entered the picture again. As with the Lancashire police file sent in April 04 (Failure in Duty), they now pretended that they hadn't received the GMP file either. (IPCC link to be added.)
A D BROWN from Internal Affairs also wrote to me, and they all wrote the same, junk mail.
I flogged the dead horse for a while and eventually asked MIKE THOMAS, DISTRICT AUDITOR for Lancashire (link to be added) if Rigby had been paid out of tax-payers' monies to sell my evidence back to the named criminals. (By then the proof that the named criminals in LCC and M.E.T. had indeed got the papers I had given to Rigby was in my possession and still is.)
Was PAYOLA involved?

Mike Thomas ignored me but I had copied my letter to him via email to MIKE TODD Chief Constable of GMP.
A C Inspector PETRYOWSKI wrote to me in Sept. 06 saying that he would investigate and contact me again.
I wrote twice more between then and January 2007 but heard nothing after his first and only letter to me.
In Feb. 07 I heard from a DS M.FREEMAN (should that be Freemason?) again, Chester House.
He told me that they had been 'granted special dispensation of the need to further investiagte from the IPCC'.
As data subject I requested a copy of whatever the IPCC had written.
When and who gave the IPCC powers that only Lord Goldsmith should have or the DPP or Serious Fraud Office or was this another insult to my intelligence?
What qualifications did IPCC staff have to decide on the outcomes of criminal investigations over the CPS etc?
Anyway, nothing arrived. Freeman ignored my Section 7 Subject access Request, Data Protection Act 1998. One can only presume that the IPCC told them they were above the law.

The public interest here is that deals are undoubtedly being done between the IPCC and police forces.
Unless Freeman was another liar?
Mike Todd has vicarious liablity for his staff committing criminal acts whilst in his employ. John Reid has vicarious liablity for Mike Todd.
Nick Hardwick of the IPCC has vicarious liablity for his staff deciding outcomes of criminal matters instead of judges, juries, the DPP, SFO and the AG.
Imagine if GMP had been given the money-box-waiting-to be-opened a.k.a. the Casino.
Just imagine.
Al Capone wanabees would have had nothing to fear.
Recommended reading, "Bent Coppers" by James Morton Warner Books 1993.
My book is well on the way , the blogs are the expurgated entries of what is being written up telling the story.

Carol Woods Lancaster 17th May 2007.
Next entry will be the link with the London Metropolitan police and will be found at http://www.criticalreadercw7.blogspot.com/ as 13th in series.